SOUTHAMPTON, N.Y. — Southampton Town Supervisor Maria Moore will face Republican Richard “Rich” Carozza this November, giving voters a choice between continuing the current Town Hall administration and turning to a challenger arguing that Southampton needs a different approach.
Suffolk County Board of Elections filings list Moore as the Democratic candidate and Carozza as the Republican candidate for Southampton Town Supervisor.
Unlike a race between two newcomers, this election comes with something voters can already measure: a governing record.
Moore is the incumbent. The supervisor is Southampton Town’s chief administrative and fiscal officer, presides over the Town Board and plays a central role in the management of town government.
That means questions involving housing, development, permitting, infrastructure, spending and the efficiency of Town Hall are not merely campaign talking points. They are also legitimate questions about the performance of the current administration.
A Race About Results
Southampton remains one of the most desirable — and expensive — places to live in the region.
Yet the prosperity associated with the Hamptons exists alongside persistent problems that affect year-round residents much differently than seasonal visitors.
Housing remains difficult for many working families to afford. Employers continue to operate in a market where workers may have to commute considerable distances because they cannot live near their jobs. Residents and builders regularly encounter a complicated land-use and permitting system. Wastewater infrastructure remains a major long-term undertaking. Traffic and development continue to generate disputes throughout the town.
None of these problems began with Maria Moore.
But incumbents eventually have to answer a different question from challengers: what has improved while they have been in charge?
Moore has served as supervisor since taking office following the 2023 election and previously served as mayor of Westhampton Beach.
She now oversees an administration with responsibilities spanning finance, human resources, land management, the Building Department, municipal works, public safety and major town projects.
The 2026 campaign therefore gives voters an opportunity to evaluate more than promises.
They can evaluate execution.
Carozza Makes the Case for Change
Carozza enters the contest arguing that Southampton Town government can operate more effectively.
His background includes experience in business, real estate, land use and government, areas that intersect directly with several of the town’s most persistent challenges.
His campaign has emphasized housing, bureaucracy, development approvals, sewer infrastructure and clean water.
Those issues give the challenger an obvious line of attack.
If housing affordability remains a crisis, what policies have actually produced additional attainable housing?
If residents and businesses believe Town Hall is too cumbersome, which procedures can be simplified?
If wastewater infrastructure is essential to protecting drinking water and the bays, how quickly are projects moving from planning to completion?
And if the cost of living continues to make Southampton increasingly difficult for middle-income families, younger residents and workers, what can town government realistically do about it?
Carozza will still have to do more than identify frustrations.
A challenger promising faster government must explain what he would change, how he would pay for it and where he would draw the line between streamlining development and protecting community character.
Those details will determine whether his candidacy develops into a substantive alternative or merely a referendum on dissatisfaction with the incumbent.
Southampton’s Central Contradiction
The politics of Southampton are complicated because residents often want things that conflict with one another.
They want more affordable housing but frequently resist greater density.
They want a quicker permitting process but also demand extensive scrutiny of new development.
They want cleaner water and expanded sewer infrastructure but may object to the costs and construction required to build it.
They want businesses to thrive but increasingly live in communities where the people working in those businesses cannot afford to reside.
There are no painless solutions to those problems.
That makes the supervisor’s race less about who can promise everything and more about which candidate is willing to identify the tradeoffs.
For Moore, that means defending the choices her administration has already made.
For Carozza, it means demonstrating that his proposed changes would work better.
Incumbency Means Accountability
One advantage of an incumbent election is that voters do not have to rely entirely on campaign literature.
Town budgets exist.
Projects have timelines.
Applications have processing times.
Housing initiatives can be counted.
Infrastructure projects can be measured against schedules and costs.
Residents can compare what was promised with what was delivered.
That should be where much of the 2026 supervisor campaign is fought.
Rather than another election dominated by party labels, Southampton voters would benefit from specific answers on measurable questions:
How much has town spending changed?
How long does it take to move common applications through Town Hall?
How many attainable or workforce housing units have actually been created?
Which major sewer and wastewater projects are on schedule, delayed or over budget?
What portions of the town’s comprehensive planning efforts have translated into policy?
And what would either candidate do differently beginning in January?
Moore enters the election asking voters to continue the administration already running Southampton Town.
Carozza is asking them to conclude that the current approach is not producing enough.
That is the choice.
The campaign between now and November should provide the evidence voters need to make it.
East End Now | Auxio.tv News