Tag: state_policy

  • Suffolk Town Leaders Join Forces Over Rising Costs, Waste Challenges and State Mandates

    Suffolk Town Leaders Join Forces Over Rising Costs, Waste Challenges and State Mandates

    FARMINGVILLE, NY — Leaders from several Suffolk County towns met at Brookhaven Town Hall to discuss rising costs, solid-waste challenges and state policies they say are putting additional pressure on local governments and taxpayers.

    Brookhaven Town Supervisor Daniel J. Panico hosted the September 18 meeting with Southampton Town Supervisor Maria Moore, Smithtown Town Supervisor Ed Wehrheim, Smithtown Councilman Thomas W. Lohmann, Southold Town Supervisor Albert J. Krupski Jr., Babylon Deputy Supervisor Tony Martinez, Brookhaven Councilman Neil A. Manzella and representatives from the New York Association of Towns. 

    According to the Town of Brookhaven, the discussion focused on several issues affecting municipalities across Long Island, including rising health-insurance and pension contributions, higher fuel and equipment costs, state funding opportunities through the Environmental Bond Act and the effect of unfunded state mandates on local taxpayers. 

    Solid-waste disposal was also a major topic. Brookhaven officials have previously warned that Long Island faces a growing waste-management challenge as disposal options become more limited, particularly with the planned closure of the Brookhaven Town Landfill. Town officials have argued that expanding rail capacity could be part of a longer-term regional solution. 

    Panico also raised concerns about state legislation that he said can diminish local control and impose policies that do not always reflect conditions on Long Island.

    “Too often, we see a city-centric State Legislature advancing policies that may work for New York City but simply do not reflect the needs or realities of Long Island and towns throughout New York State,” Panico said. 

    He added that local officials need to work together on issues including unfunded mandates, rising municipal costs and home-rule authority. 

    The meeting also included discussion of a possible Long Island conference that would bring town officials together to address shared concerns and coordinate regional advocacy. No formal date or structure for that conference was announced. 

    The gathering reflects a broader effort among Suffolk municipalities to coordinate on issues that cross town boundaries, particularly waste disposal, infrastructure costs and state-local government relations.

  • Kiely Pushes Back on Albany Control of East End Battery Projects

    Kiely Pushes Back on Albany Control of East End Battery Projects

    By East End Now | Auxio.tv News

    Stephen Kiely is making local control of battery energy storage projects a central issue in his campaign for New York State Assembly.

    Kiely, the Republican candidate in the 1st Assembly District, has argued that East End towns should retain meaningful authority over where large battery energy storage systems, or BESS facilities, are located.

    That debate is becoming more important as Albany considers new rules for energy storage projects.

    New York lawmakers have already advanced legislation requiring developers of larger commercial battery-storage projects to notify local officials when seeking permits. Other proposals would establish setback requirements and additional public-hearing protections. 

    The broader issue is not whether battery storage has a role in New York’s energy system.

    It does.

    The harder question is who should decide where those facilities go.

    State officials have statewide energy goals. Local governments have to deal with the consequences of individual projects — including land use, emergency response, traffic, neighborhood compatibility and public concern over fire safety.

    That creates a basic mismatch of incentives.

    Albany can approve a policy.

    A town has to live with the result.

    Kiely’s position is that those decisions should not be pushed upward simply because the state wants to accelerate energy development.

    That argument is especially relevant on the East End, where Southold has already imposed and extended a moratorium on new BESS development while local officials continue reviewing safety and siting concerns.

    The Legislature itself appears to recognize that local communities need a stronger voice. One current bill would require notice to local officials for certain commercial storage projects, while another proposal would establish minimum setbacks and require public hearings before approval. 

    Kiely’s campaign is turning that debate into a larger question about local government.

    If a community bears the risk of a project, how much authority should it have over the decision?

    That is likely to remain a significant issue in the East End Assembly race as Kiely challenges Democratic incumbent Tommy John Schiavoni in November. The two are the general-election candidates for Assembly District 1. 

    For East End voters, the debate is not simply about batteries.

    It is about whether major land-use decisions should be made closest to the people who will live with them.

    East End Now — Your East End. Your News.